What justifies liberal education in John Stuart Mill's theory of freedom?
What justifies liberal education in John Stuart Mill's theory of freedom?
dc.contributor.advisor | Çalkıvik, Emine Aslı | |
dc.contributor.author | Yıldız, Ayşe İrem | |
dc.contributor.authorID | 419201015 | |
dc.contributor.department | Political Studies | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-14T13:15:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-05-14T13:15:13Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-01-31 | |
dc.description | Thesis (M.Sc.) -- Istanbul Technical University, Graduate School, 2024 | |
dc.description.abstract | John Stuart Mill is among the prominent names of the classical liberalism movement and utilitarian ethics. He argues that freedom is the natural right of man and the source of development, therefore it cannot be limited by the state. For this reason, individualist readings of Mill are very common. However, the social interpretation of Mill is also possible. Therefore, it is necessary to look at Mill's work on liberal education since it has bold references to social development as well as individual progress. Mill uses the term liberal education in his speech at the University of St. Andrew and he explains the qualities of such an education. Since there is not a single agreement on what liberal education is there have been varied roles attributed to it. While it is considered to be the national training of citizens. It is also referenced as a marketplace to make a profit in the economic perspective of contemporary times. It used to be an aristocratic education for high classes during the Middle Ages. However, in the Enlightenment period, classical liberal tradition offered a new perspective and as one of the key figures in this period, J.S. Mill argues that man is free, and the existence of the abilities given to him from birth is proof that he is expected to use them freely. However, education, how people establish and develop the greatest civilization, ignores this nature of people. It makes them unable to use their innate abilities, let alone use them. Hence, education impedes both individual and social development. Mill explained the qualities of liberal education in his speech at the University of St. Andrew. According to Mill liberal education should recognize individual freedom because this will ensure individual development. An education that ensures individual freedom doesn't restrict people's interests, indeed should offer them options in line with their tastes and capacities. For this reason, the curriculum should be scientific, artistic, literary as well as philosophic. However, individuals' development should not be separated from the principle of freedom, therefore it is also important to create a society that embraces this principle. In other words, the purpose of liberal education is to ensure both individual and social development by protecting individual freedoms. Liberal education is a means to creating this structure without losing the individual will. | |
dc.description.degree | M.Sc. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11527/27044 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Graduate School | |
dc.sdg.type | Goal 16: Peace and Justice Strong Institutions | |
dc.sdg.type | Goal 17: Partnerships to achieve the Goal | |
dc.subject | liberal education | |
dc.subject | liberal eğitim | |
dc.subject | freedom | |
dc.subject | özgürlük | |
dc.subject | education philosophy | |
dc.subject | eğitim felsefesi | |
dc.subject | political philosophy | |
dc.subject | siyaset felsefesi | |
dc.title | What justifies liberal education in John Stuart Mill's theory of freedom? | |
dc.title.alternative | John Stuart Mill'in özgürlük teorisinde liberal eğitimin gerekçelendirilmesi | |
dc.type | Master Thesis |