Yayın:
Effective drug design screening in bacterial glycolytic enzymes via targeting alternative allosteric sites

dc.contributor.authorTurkmenoglu, Ipek
dc.contributor.authorKurtulus, Gamze
dc.contributor.authorSesal, Cenk
dc.contributor.authorKurkcuoglu, Ozge
dc.contributor.authorAyyildiz, Merve
dc.contributor.authorCeliker, Serkan
dc.contributor.authorOzhelvaci, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorDu, Xin
dc.contributor.authorLiu, George Y.
dc.contributor.authorArditi, Moshe
dc.contributor.authorAkten, Ebru Demet
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-25T05:36:54Z
dc.date.issued2024-12-01
dc.description.abstractThree glycolytic enzymes phosphofructokinase (PFK), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GADPH) and pyruvate kinase (PK) that belong to Staphylococcus aureus were used as targets for screening a dataset composed of 7229 compounds of which 1416 were FDA-approved. Instead of catalytic sites, evolutionarily less conserved allosteric sites were targeted to identify compounds that would selectively bind the bacteria's glycolytic enzymes instead of the human host. Seven different allosteric sites provided by three enzymes were used in independent screening experiments via docking. For each of the seven sites, a total of 723 compounds were selected as the top 10 % which displayed the highest binding affinities. All compounds were then united to yield the top 54 drug candidates shared by all seven sites. Next, 17 out of 54 were selected and subjected to in vitro experiments for testing their inhibition capability for antibacterial growth and enzymatic activity. Accordingly, four compounds displaying antibacterial growth inhibition above 40 % were determined as Candesartan cilexetil, Montelukast (sodium), Dronedarone (hydrochloride) and Thonzonium (bromide). In a second round of experiment, Candesartan cilexetil and Thonzonium displayed exceptionally high killing efficiencies on two bacterial strains of S.aureus (methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant) with concentrations as low as 4 μg/mL and 0.5 μg/mL. Yet, their enzymatic assays were not in accordance with their killing effectiveness. Different inhibitory effects was observed for each compound in each enzymatic assay. A more effective target strategy would be to screen for drug compounds that woud inhibit a combination of glycolytic enzymes observed in the glycolytic pathway.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2024.110190
dc.description.urihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39486564
dc.description.urihttps://aperta.ulakbim.gov.tr/record/283773
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.abb.2024.110190
dc.identifier.issn0003-9861
dc.identifier.openairedoi_dedup___::6e440849a850239eaa8433449cd6fcc5
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0955-5673
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0358-3171
dc.identifier.startpage110190
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11527/47171
dc.identifier.volume762
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.relation.ispartofArchives of Biochemistry and Biophysics
dc.rightsOPEN
dc.subjectMolecular Docking Simulation
dc.subjectStaphylococcus aureus
dc.subjectBacterial Proteins
dc.subjectDrug Design
dc.subjectPyruvate Kinase
dc.subjectDrug Evaluation, Preclinical
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectEnzyme Inhibitors
dc.subjectGlycolysis
dc.subjectAllosteric Site
dc.subjectAnti-Bacterial Agents
dc.titleEffective drug design screening in bacterial glycolytic enzymes via targeting alternative allosteric sites
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar