WTP calculation accuracy using stated preference survey data: Comparison between logistic regression and neural network methods

dc.contributor.advisor Hannum, Christopher
dc.contributor.author Opuz, Gülce
dc.contributor.authorID 634734 tr_TR
dc.contributor.department Department of Economics tr_TR
dc.date.accessioned 2021-12-22T13:13:17Z
dc.date.available 2021-12-22T13:13:17Z
dc.date.issued 2020-07-14
dc.description Thesis (M.A) -- İstanbul Technical University, Institute of Social Sciences, 2020 tr_TR
dc.description Tez (Yüksek Lisans) -- İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 2020
dc.description.abstract Valuing environmental recreational sites, which is also referred as non-market valuations, is widely used in environmental economics studies. Survey datasets are used to assess the price value of the site to an individual, which is referred as maximum willingness to pay (WTP), in order to understand demand for the sites. WTP calculations are used to decide on recreational site alterations, therefore an accurate WTP calculation is very important on the decision. The most common type for recreational site surveys is stated preference, where respondents are given two or more alternatives to choose one option out of them. Logistic regression is used in binary choice datasets because linear models don't work with binary outputs. Thus, traditional logit models are used most commonly with random utility models for stated preference discrete choice datasets. Neural networks on the other hand are improved logistic regression models, they are combination of logistic regressions with a learning process. Therefore, in order to calculate more accurate willingness to pay estimates, neural network models which are improved logistic regressions, could be used instead of simple traditional logit models. With this research, we wanted to test the superiority of neural networks on traditional logit in terms of willingness to pay estimation accuracy. In order to compare WTP calculation accuracies, we calculated out-of-sample prediction accuracies of the two methods and compared marginal effects and coefficients of covariates. Marginal effects of covariates would acquire us the effect of covariates on the probability of choosing one alternative, therefore they indicate the variable importance on WTP calculations. Coefficients on the other hand are used in WTP calculations because they represent the strength of particular covariate on the site choice. We examined two different articles that use stated preference survey datasets which are conducted for assessing the demand for recreational sites tr_TR
dc.description.degree M.A. tr_TR
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11527/19734
dc.language.iso en tr_TR
dc.publisher Social Sciences Institute tr_TR
dc.subject Willingness to pay more tr_TR
dc.subject Logistic regression method tr_TR
dc.title WTP calculation accuracy using stated preference survey data: Comparison between logistic regression and neural network methods tr_TR
dc.title.alternative Bı̇ldı̇rı̇mlı̇ tercı̇h araştırması verı̇lerı̇nde WTP hesaplama doğruluğu: Lojı̇stı̇k regresyon ve yapay sı̇nı̇r ağ yöntemlerı̇ karşılaştırılması tr_TR
dc.type Master Thesis tr_TR
Dosyalar
Orijinal seri
Şimdi gösteriliyor 1 - 1 / 1
thumbnail.default.alt
Ad:
412171005.pdf
Boyut:
1.67 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama
Lisanslı seri
Şimdi gösteriliyor 1 - 1 / 1
thumbnail.default.placeholder
Ad:
license.txt
Boyut:
3.06 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama