Yayın:
The effect of aeration mode (intermittent vs. continuous) on nutrient removal and greenhouse gas emissions in the wastewater treatment plant of Corleone (Italy)

dc.contributor.authorMannina, Giorgio
dc.contributor.authorBosco Mofatto, Paulo Marcelo
dc.contributor.authorCosenza, Alida
dc.contributor.authorDi Trapani, Daniele
dc.contributor.authorGulhan, Hazal
dc.contributor.authorMineo, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorMakinia, Jacek
dc.contributor.ituauthorGülhan, Eksin Hazal
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-25T09:25:59Z
dc.date.issued2024-05-01
dc.description.abstractThe paper reports the results of an experimental study aimed at comparing two configurations of a full-scale wastewater treatment plant (WWTP): conventional activated sludge (CAS) and oxic-settling-anaerobic process (OSA) with intermittent aeration (IA). A comprehensive monitoring campaign was carried out to assess multiple parameters for comparing the two configurations: carbon and nutrient removal, greenhouse gas emissions, respirometric analysis, and sludge production. A holistic approach has been adopted in the study with the novelty of including the carbon footprint (CF) contribution (as direct, indirect and derivative emissions) in comparing the two configurations. Results showed that the OSA-IA configuration performed better in total chemical oxygen demand (TCOD) and ortho-phosphate (PO4-P) removal. CAS performed better for Total Suspended Solids (TSS) removal showing a worsening of settling properties for OSA-IA. The heterotrophic yield coefficient and maximum growth rate decreased, suggesting a shift to sludge reduction metabolism in the OSA-IA configuration. Autotrophic biomass showed a reduced yield coefficient and maximum growth yield due to the negative effects of the sludge holding tank in the OSA-IA configuration on nitrification. The OSA-IA configuration had higher indirect emissions (30.5 % vs 21.3 % in CAS) from additional energy consumption due to additional mixers and sludge recirculation pumps. The CF value was lower for OSA-IA than for CAS configuration (0.36 kgCO2/m3 vs 0.39 kgCO2/m3 in CAS).
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171420
dc.description.urihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38438034
dc.description.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171420
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171420
dc.identifier.issn0048-9697
dc.identifier.openairedoi_dedup___::77db98abbbca56bf09ff4f5435825450
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6205-9353
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8155-9970
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5346-1041
dc.identifier.startpage171420
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11527/48500
dc.identifier.volume924
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.relation.ispartofScience of The Total Environment
dc.rightsOPEN
dc.titleThe effect of aeration mode (intermittent vs. continuous) on nutrient removal and greenhouse gas emissions in the wastewater treatment plant of Corleone (Italy)
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8155-9970

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar