Yayın:
A Quantitative Analysis Towards Interim-Reuse of Urban Voids: An Ecological Treatment Guideline with Regenerative Approaches

dc.contributor.authorSamadi, Mojtaba
dc.contributor.authorErdem Kaya, Meltem
dc.contributor.ituauthorErdem, Kaya Meltem
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-24T13:10:10Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-29
dc.description.abstractAccording to the United Nations declarations in 2019, cities, as humanity’s primary living habitat, will accommodate 68% of the world’s population by 2050. The more people settle in urban centres, the more severe the impacts are on ecosystems and the climate. Due to rapid urbanisation, the number of unused and under-managed urban spaces or “Urban voids” is rising. However, regenerative approaches can turn urban voids into assets to combat climate change and environmental issues. The regenerative design promotes ecological systems to regrow by allowing every urban component, like houses, workplaces, and neighbourhoods, to flourish ecologically. This research starts with reviewing related terms for urban voids beside a fundamental approach towards utilising them, “Interim re-use.” With these in hand, the research’s methodology mapped 577 urban voids in its “Balat and Fener” case study, two juxtaposing historical districts in Istanbul, Turkey. The study goes on to classify the mapped urban voids into six distinctive types. The classification of urban voids is done using a decision tree model with five features that are assigned binary values. The features are as follows: “Ownership,” “Debris,” “Economic activity,” “Seal,” and “Leisure facilities.” The next phase evaluates each parcel based on ecological criteria; each void is rated through a Likert scale in terms of “Vegetation,” “Permeability,” “Ruggedness,” and “Enclosure,” and thence, receives an ecological identity. After each parcel is classified and assigned its ecological identity, a two-phased treatment approach composed of twelve solutions is applied. Suppose the subject lacks the fundamental prerequisites, such as a permeable surface. In that case, proper land preparation solutions will be applied, and based on their ecological identity, they then receive the second phase’s applications. In conclusion, following the guidelines proposed in this paper, the decision-makers can treat urban voids to become more ecologically thriving and enhance their ecological performance.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.51596/sijocp.v3i2.48
dc.identifier.doi10.51596/sijocp.v3i2.48
dc.identifier.eissn2977-814X
dc.identifier.endpage8
dc.identifier.openairedoi_________::fa7ee6e3594e9557b3e8b0e3a24e5b9f
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1834-2004
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3272-3049
dc.identifier.startpage1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11527/32566
dc.identifier.volume3
dc.publisherSPACE Studies of Planning and Architecture Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofSPACE International Journal of Conference Proceedings
dc.sdg.typeGoal 13: Climate Action
dc.sdg.typeGoal 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities
dc.sdg.typeGoal 15: Life on Land
dc.sdg.typeGoal 6: Clean Water and Sanitation
dc.sdg.typeGoal 12: Responsible Consumption and Production
dc.titleA Quantitative Analysis Towards Interim-Reuse of Urban Voids: An Ecological Treatment Guideline with Regenerative Approaches
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3272-3049

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar