Publication:
THE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF THE POST-MISSION WEB-BASED STATIC AND KINEMATIC PPP-AR SERVICE

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Advisor

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Faculty of Mining, Geology and Petroleum Engineering

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Abstract

The use of the Precise Point Positioning (PPP) technique has become very advantageous with the development of GNSS positioning technology. It is possible to get highly accurate position information without the need of any reference station data using the PPP technique. However, there are various factors that affect the accuracy of PPP solutions, including the initial phase ambiguity solution type, which can be fixed or float, atmospheric effects, observation length, used satellite systems, and used precise products. The Canadian Spatial Reference System-Precise Point Positioning (CSRS-PPP) service, one of the online PPP services, was updated on October 20th, 2020, and upgraded to version 3, capable of the Ambiguity-Fixed (PPP-AR) solution. Prior to this date, the service had offered the Ambiguity-Float (PPP-Float) solution. In this study, it is aimed to investigate the effect of using different satellite systems (GPS, GPS&GLONASS), length of observation time, static/kinematic processing modes, and initial phase ambiguity solution types on PPP accuracy. The daily observation data of ANKR, ISTA, IZMI, MERS, and KRS1 IGS GNSS stations located within the borders of Türkiye, divided into different sub-sessions (1-hour, 2-hours, 4-hours, 8-hours, and 12-hours) were processed using CSRS-PPP web-based service as PPP-Float before the update and PPP-AR after the update. As a result of the comparison, the combined use of GPS & GLONASS satellite systems instead of using GPS satellites alone has increased horizontal and vertical accuracy in both static/kinematic PPP-Float and PPP-AR solutions. Considering the static solutions, horizontal and vertical position accuracies increase as the observation time increases in both ambiguity solution methods using different constellations. In the case of comparison of the ambiguity solution methods, it was found that the PPP-AR approach offered higher accuracy than the PPP-Float in all solution cases.

Description

Subject

Kinematics, GPS, Aerospace Engineering, FOS: Mechanical engineering, Oceanography, Real-time computing, Systems engineering, FOS: Economics and business, Engineering, Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), Global Positioning System, Service (business), Business, Classical mechanics, Global Sea Level Variability and Change, Float (project management), Precise Point Positioning, Marketing, QE1-996.5, Mining engineering. Metallurgy, Satellite system, Geography, CSRS-PPP, Physics, TN1-997, Geology, Real Time Kinematic, FOS: Earth and related environmental sciences, PPP-Float, Remote sensing, Computer science, GLONASS, PPP-AR, Earth and Planetary Sciences, Aerospace engineering, Satellite, GNSS applications, Physical Sciences, Telecommunications, Inertial Navigation Systems and Sensor Fusion Techniques, Geodesy

Citation

Collections

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Goal

1

Views

0

Downloads
View PlumX Details