Yayın:
Treatment options for effluents from a solid waste transport station

dc.contributor.authorKutluay, Gulin
dc.contributor.authorIskender, Gulen
dc.contributor.authorBabuna, Fatos Germirli
dc.contributor.authorOrhon, Derin
dc.contributor.ituauthorİskender, Fatma Gülen
dc.contributor.ituauthorBabuna, Fatma Fatoş
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-25T23:54:21Z
dc.date.issued2007-06-01
dc.description.abstractAbstract In this study the wastewaters originating from solid waste transport stations that are established to compress the collected solid wastes from households in order to ease further transportation to final disposal sites (e.g. sanitary landfills) were investigated in terms of characterization and treatability. The results of conventional characterization showed that although the strength of wastewater may be subject to changes depending on the amount of water used for site cleaning, the effluents can be classified as strong wastewaters. Unlike the landfill leachates the mentioned wastewaters did not contain excessive amounts of nitrogen. The soluble COD of the wastewaters accounted for approximately 80% of the total COD, emphasizing the predominance of soluble organic pollutants. To remove soluble organics on the other hand, although both chemical oxidation processes and biological treatment such as aerobic systems; anaerobic technologies or a combination of both anaerobic and aerobic processes can be applied, biotreatment overcomes chemical oxidation due to economic concerns. Assessment of inert COD fractions under aerobic and anaerobic conditions indicated that an anaerobic process must be applied as the first unit of the treatment scheme. However since it was not possible to comply the discharge limitations of 160 mg l–1 COD by solely using an anaerobic biological treatment, an additional treatment unit i.e. aerobic biological treatment or chemical oxidation etc. following the anaerobic one must be used. It was recommended to run additional experimental research to find out more about both the proper type and the optimal operating conditions of the mentioned second treatment unit.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2006.02.085
dc.description.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2006.02.085
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.desal.2006.02.085
dc.identifier.endpage101
dc.identifier.issn0011-9164
dc.identifier.openairedoi_dedup___::a6f0adfa30664fba299c60627e907914
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9539-9848
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0365-2373
dc.identifier.startpage96
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11527/53358
dc.identifier.volume211
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.relation.ispartofDesalination
dc.rightsCLOSED
dc.sdg.typeGoal 13: Climate Action
dc.sdg.typeGoal 6: Clean Water and Sanitation
dc.sdg.typeGoal 12: Responsible Consumption and Production
dc.titleTreatment options for effluents from a solid waste transport station
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-9539-9848
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0365-2373

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar