Yayın:
Effect of different segmentation methods using optical satellite imagery to estimate fuzzy clustering parameters for sentinel-1a sar images

dc.contributor.authorBayram, Bülent
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Nusret
dc.contributor.authorAkpınar, Burak
dc.contributor.authorS. Oy
dc.contributor.authorErdem, Fırat
dc.contributor.authorVögtle, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorŞeker, Dursun Zafer
dc.contributor.ituauthorŞeker, Dursun Zafer
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-26T02:47:23Z
dc.date.issued2018-09-26
dc.description.abstractAbstract. Optical and SAR data are efficient data sources for shoreline monitoring. The processing of SAR data such as feature extraction is not an easy task since the images have totally different structure than optical imagery. Determination of threshold value is a challenging task for SAR data. In this study, SENTINEL-2A optical data was used as ancillary data to predict fuzzy membership parameters for segmentation of SENTINEL-1A SAR data to extract shoreline. SENTINEL-2A and SENTINEL-1A satellite images used were taken in September 9, 2016 and September 13, 2016 respectively. Three different segmentation algorithms which are selected from object, learning and pixel-based methods. They have been exploited to obtain land and water classes which have been used as an input data for parameter estimation. Thus, the performance of different segmentation algorithm has been investigated and analysed. In the first step of the study, Mean-Shift, Random Forest and Whale Optimization algorithms have been employed to obtain water and land classes from the SENTINEL-2A image. Water and land classes derived from each algorithm – are used as input data, and then the required parameters for the fuzzy clustering of SENTINEL-1A SAR image, were calculated. Lake Constance, Germany has been chosen as the study area. In this study, additionally an interface plugin has been developed and integrated into the open source Quantum GIS software platform. The developed interface allows non-experts to process and extract the shorelines without using any parameters. But, this system requires pre-segmented data as input. Thus, the batch process calculates the required parameters.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-1-39-2018
dc.description.urihttps://www.int-arch-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/XLII-1/39/2018/isprs-archives-XLII-1-39-2018.pdf
dc.description.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.60692/mrthp-qjr05
dc.description.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.60692/2cfds-dk617
dc.description.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.5445/ir/1000087846
dc.description.urihttps://isprs-archives.copernicus.org/articles/XLII-1/39/2018/
dc.description.urihttps://doaj.org/article/256a596a284b4e84a483d4b37f941911
dc.description.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-1-39-2018
dc.description.urihttps://avesis.yildiz.edu.tr/publication/details/1c5d3671-c737-4859-bb0e-48eb45aa33f7/oai
dc.description.urihttps://publikationen.bibliothek.kit.edu/1000087846
dc.description.urihttps://publikationen.bibliothek.kit.edu/1000087846/19756504
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.5445/IR/1000087846
dc.description.urihttp://nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn:nbn:de:swb:90-878466
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5445/IR/1000087846
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-1-39-2018
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/isprs-archives-xlii-1-39-2018
dc.identifier.eissn2194-9034
dc.identifier.endpage43
dc.identifier.openairedoi_dedup___::ca7a916a5f4eb18012f7f720691f0f50
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4248-116x
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8756-7127
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3076-1578
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6163-1979
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7498-1540
dc.identifier.startpage39
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11527/58051
dc.identifier.volumeXLII-1
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherCopernicus GmbH
dc.relation.ispartofThe International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
dc.rightsOPEN
dc.subjectTechnology
dc.subjectArtificial intelligence
dc.subjectFeature (linguistics)
dc.subjectSatellite Altimetry
dc.subjectImage Analysis
dc.subjectOceanography
dc.subjectPattern recognition (psychology)
dc.subjectFeature Extraction
dc.subjectEngineering
dc.subjectCluster analysis
dc.subjectSegmentation
dc.subjectMedia Technology
dc.subjectDynamics of Ocean Surface Waves and Wind Interaction
dc.subjectApplied optics. Photonics
dc.subjectImage segmentation
dc.subjectinfo:eu-repo/classification/ddc/550
dc.subjectddc:550
dc.subjectFuzzy clustering
dc.subjectGeology
dc.subjectLinguistics
dc.subjectFOS: Earth and related environmental sciences
dc.subjectRemote sensing
dc.subjectEngineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
dc.subjectDetection and Impact of Oil Spills
dc.subjectHyperspectral Image Analysis and Classification
dc.subjectPollution
dc.subjectComputer science
dc.subjectTA1501-1820
dc.subjectFOS: Philosophy, ethics and religion
dc.subjectEarth and Planetary Sciences
dc.subjectFuzzy logic
dc.subjectEarth sciences
dc.subjectPhilosophy
dc.subjectSAR Imaging
dc.subjectAerospace engineering
dc.subjectSatellite
dc.subjectPhysical Sciences
dc.subjectEnvironmental Science
dc.subjectFOS: Languages and literature
dc.subjectPixel
dc.subjectTA1-2040
dc.titleEffect of different segmentation methods using optical satellite imagery to estimate fuzzy clustering parameters for sentinel-1a sar images
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7498-1540

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar