Yayın:
EFFECTIVENESS OF CASIRIVIMAB-IMDEVIMAB AND SOTROVIMAB MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY TREATMENT AMONG HIGH-RISK PATIENTS WITH SARS-CoV-2 INFECTION: A REAL-WORLD EXPERIENCE

dc.contributor.authorMurugapandian, Sangeetha
dc.contributor.authorGungor, Ahmet B.
dc.contributor.authorAl-Obaidi, Mohanad
dc.contributor.authorThajudeen, Bijin
dc.contributor.authorWong, Ryan C.
dc.contributor.authorMansour, Iyad
dc.contributor.authorZangeneh, Tirdad T.
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Katherine M.
dc.contributor.authorLow-Adegbija, Nicole E.
dc.contributor.authorAlam, Ruhaniyah
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez-Negrete, Elvira
dc.contributor.authorSandıkçı, Burhaneddin
dc.contributor.authorGupta, Gaurav
dc.contributor.authorBedrick, Edward J.
dc.contributor.authorSaridogan, Turcin
dc.contributor.authorMendoza, Katherine
dc.contributor.authorTanriover, Bekir
dc.contributor.ituauthorSandıkçı, Burhaneddin
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-24T12:53:36Z
dc.date.issued2022-12-26
dc.description.abstractABSTRACTBACKGROUNDSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) can evade neutralizing antibodies, raising concerns about the effectiveness of anti-spike monoclonal antibodies (mAb).METHODSThis study reports a retrospective data analysis in Banner Health Care System. Out of 109,788 adult patients who tested positive for COVID-19, the study cohort was split into patients who received Casirivimab-Imdevimab (Cas-Imd) (N=10,836; Delta-predominant period 6/2021-11/2021) and Sotrovimab (N=998; Omicron-predominant period 12/2021-1/2022) mAb compared to propensity-matched control groups (N=10,836 and N=998), respectively. Index date was the date of mAb administration or the date of positive COVID-19 testing. The primary and secondary outcomes were the incidence of composite outcome (all-cause hospitalization and/or mortality) and ICU admission at 30-days following index date, respectively.RESULTSCompared to the propensity-matched untreated control cohort, the Cas-Imd mAb reduced the composite outcome (from 7.5% to 3.7%; difference: -3.8% [95% CI: (-4.4%, -3.2%)], p <0.01) regardless of their vaccination status, while Sotrovimab mAb did not (5.0% vs. 3.8%; difference: -1.2% [95% CI: (-3.1%, 0.7%)], p =0.22). In terms of the secondary outcome, similarly Cas-Imd mAb decreased ICU admission during the first hospitalization (from 1.5% to 0.5%; difference: -1.0% [95% CI: (-1.3%, -0.7%)], p <0.01) compared to the control group, whereas Sotrovimab mAb did not (0.9% vs. 0.6%; difference: -0.3% [95% CI: (-1.2%, 0.6%)], p =0.61). Comparing the periods, the Omicron-predominant period was associated with lower composite outcome than that during the Delta-predominant period.CONCLUSIONSCas-Imd mAb was effective against the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant, however sotrovimab lacked efficacy in patients with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron-predominant period.Key PointsThis retrospective propensity matched analysis showed that treatment with Cas-Imd mAb was effective against the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant to reduce the all-cause hospitalization and mortality within 30 days, by contrast sotrovimab mAb utilization lacked the efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.23.22283921
dc.identifier.doi10.1101/2022.12.23.22283921
dc.identifier.openairedoi_________::d9610199b4a7501b7035f6ff383c65e4
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1919-1970
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9618-2336
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11527/32077
dc.publisherCold Spring Harbor Laboratory
dc.sdg.typeGoal 3: Good Health and Well-being
dc.titleEFFECTIVENESS OF CASIRIVIMAB-IMDEVIMAB AND SOTROVIMAB MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY TREATMENT AMONG HIGH-RISK PATIENTS WITH SARS-CoV-2 INFECTION: A REAL-WORLD EXPERIENCE
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3202-8289

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar