Yayın:
Satellite-Derived Bathymetry Mapping on Horseshoe Island, Antarctic Peninsula, with Open-Source Satellite Images: Evaluation of Atmospheric Correction Methods and Empirical Models

dc.contributor.authorGülher, Emre
dc.contributor.authorAlganci, Ugur
dc.contributor.ituauthorAlgancı, Uğur
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-25T01:46:41Z
dc.date.issued2023-05-14
dc.description.abstractSatellite-derived bathymetry (SDB) is the process of estimating water depth in shallow coastal and inland waters using satellite imagery. Recent advances in technology and data processing have led to improvements in the accuracy and availability of SDB. The increased availability of free optical satellite sensors, such as Landsat missions and Sentinel 2 satellites, has increased the quantity and frequency of SDB research and mapping efforts. In addition, machine learning (ML)- and deep learning (DL)-based algorithms, which can learn to identify features that are indicative of water depth, such as color or texture variations, have started to be used for extracting bathymetry information from satellite imagery. This study aims to produce an initial optical image-based SBD map of Horseshoe Island’s shallow coasts and to perform a comprehensive and comparative evaluation with Landsat 8 and Sentinel 2 satellite images. Our research considers the performance of empirical SDB models (classical, ML-based, and DL-based) and the effects of the atmospheric correction methods ACOLITE, iCOR, and ATCOR. For all band combinations and depth intervals, the ML-based random forest and XGBoost models delivered the highest performance and best fitting ability by achieving the lowest error with MAEs smaller than 1 m up to 10 m depth and a maximum correlation of R2 around 0.80. These models are followed by the DL-based ANN and CNN models. Nonetheless, the non-linearity of the reflectance–depth connection was significantly reduced by the ML-based models. Furthermore, Landsat 8 showed better performance for 10–20 m depth intervals and in the entire range of (0–20 m), while Sentinel 2 was slightly better up to 10 m depth intervals. Lastly, ACOLITE, iCOR, and ATCOR provided reliable and consistent results for SDB, where ACOLITE provided the highest automation.
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/rs15102568
dc.description.urihttps://doaj.org/article/9016430ec487495082c88a18e1ecc01c
dc.description.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs15102568
dc.description.urihttps://aperta.ulakbim.gov.tr/record/273202
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/rs15102568
dc.identifier.eissn2072-4292
dc.identifier.openairedoi_dedup___::4645e2bb2d998fa49225cc81b20d9258
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6548-6561
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5693-3614
dc.identifier.startpage2568
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11527/41795
dc.identifier.volume15
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.relation.ispartofRemote Sensing
dc.rightsOPEN
dc.sdg.typeGoal 13: Climate Action
dc.sdg.typeGoal 14: Life Below Water
dc.subjectLandsat 8
dc.subjectScience
dc.subjectdeep learning
dc.subjectmachine learning
dc.subjectSentinel 2
dc.subjectsatellite-derived bathymetry
dc.subjectLandsat 8
dc.subjectSentinel 2
dc.subjectmachine learning
dc.subjectdeep learning
dc.subjectatmospheric correction
dc.subjectatmospheric correction
dc.subjectsatellite-derived bathymetry
dc.titleSatellite-Derived Bathymetry Mapping on Horseshoe Island, Antarctic Peninsula, with Open-Source Satellite Images: Evaluation of Atmospheric Correction Methods and Empirical Models
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5693-3614

Dosyalar

Koleksiyonlar