Comparative studies on the performance of a roadheader, impact hammer and drilling and blasting method in the excavation of metro station tunnels in Istanbul

Abstract

Drilling and blasting is the most widely used excavation method in miningand tunnelling especially in hard rock conditions. But in recent years, the application of roadheaders and impact hammers in hard rock, especially in fractured geological formations has increased considerably. However, itis strongly emphasized that the prediction of the machine performance plays an important role in the time scheduling and in the economy of tunnelling projects and accumulated data will serve a sound basis for performance prediction models. This paper presents information on Istanbul Kadikoy–Kartal metro tunnels which are planned to be constructed in two stages, the first one which is in Kozyatagi–Kadikoy direction and the second in Kozyatagi–Kartal direction. The construction method of the Kozyatagi–Kadikoy station tunnels is first summarized and later, the performance of a roadheader, impact hammer and the results of drilling and blasting methods are compared. The results of this study show that machine utilization time is 28.2%for roadheader and 14.2% for impact hammers. Average net cutting rates (NCR) are 32.26 m3/h for roadheader (218.3 m3/day), net breaking rate (NBR) 13.1 m3/h (45 m3/day) for impact hammers and production rate with drill and blast method (D&B) is found to be 187 m3/day. (A) Reprinted with permission from Elsevier.